The name Arsean Hicks should be known across Virginia. His decades-long legal battle is not just a personal fight for freedom; it is a critical case that exposed deep flaws in our justice system and ultimately helped change Virginia law.
In late 2024, a major victory arrived when a Circuit Court judge granted a writ of habeas corpus, vacating Hicks' 2001 murder conviction and opening the door for a new trial. This ruling was the culmination of a fight that began when Hicks was just 16 years old.
The Original Conviction and the Withheld Evidence
In 1999, Hicks was arrested for the murder of an off-duty Navy police officer, Lisa Bailey, during a robbery at a Norfolk diner. He was convicted in 2001 and sentenced to 80 years in prison.
Hicks and his legal team consistently argued two key points:
1. Coerced Confession: Hicks claimed his confession was forced out of him by former Norfolk Detective Robert Glenn Ford (who was later convicted of corruption). Medical records documenting an alleged beating were reportedly withheld from the defense.
2. Exculpatory Evidence: Crucially, an affidavit from his former roommate, Larry Roscoe, surfaced years later. Roscoe allegedly confessed that the murder weapon belonged to him and that he was the shooter, but this information was never presented to Hicks’ defense team.
A New Law for Suppressed Evidence
Hicks’ legal challenge initially ran into a devastating roadblock: Virginia’s strict statute of limitations for filing habeas corpus petitions. The courts initially ruled that his claim, based on the suppressed affidavit, was simply too late.
However, the tireless work of Hicks and his attorneys, alongside the Innocence Project, led to a monumental change. His case became the catalyst for the Virginia Supreme Court to rule that illegally suppressed exculpatory evidence must be considered, no matter when it is discovered.
Though the ruling didn't immediately grant Hicks individual relief, it secured a fundamental protection for every future wrongly convicted person in the Commonwealth.
The Taint of Corruption
The decision to vacate Hicks' conviction is deeply tied to the ongoing review of cases connected to the now-disgraced Detective Robert Glenn Ford. As the Norfolk Commonwealth’s Attorney stated, too many innocent people have wasted away in prison because of evidence suppression, and a wrongful conviction provides only "false closure" to victims.
Arsean Hicks’ case is a powerful reminder that:
• A conviction is not the same as truth.
• The integrity of our justice system depends on transparency.
The Commonwealth must now decide whether to retry Hicks without the "stain of the original misconduct." Whatever comes next, Arsean Hicks' journey—from a teenage convict to a catalyst for legal reform—will remain a testament to the enduring power of fighting for the truth.
What are your thoughts on Arsean Hicks’ case? Join the conversation in the comments below.
Comments ()