Your Cart
Loading

Every Method Has Its Season: Why Dogma is Ruining Athletic Development


"To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven..."
Ecclesiastes 3:1

When I first came up in the strength and conditioning field in the early 2000s, the landscape was intensely fractured.


Coaches didn't just pick exercises; they joined ideological tribes. On one end, Louie Simmons and Westside barbell culture pushed the Conjugate Method. Down in SEC country, the Gale Hatch system of explosive Olympic lifting dominated weight rooms. Meanwhile, High Intensity Training (HIT) advocates—rooted in the Arthur Jones and Mike Mentzer bodybuilding mentalities—preached low-volume, to-failure training.


Everyone was at war over who had the "one true system."


Looking back, the tribalism was completely unnecessary. If you looked under the hood of each methodology, their origins were obvious: Powerlifting, Olympic Weightlifting, and Bodybuilding. More importantly, none of them were mutually exclusive. A smart strength coach could look at basic linear periodization and see that each method simply belonged to a different season of the training year.


The Natural Architecture of a Training Year


Training isn't about dogmatic loyalty to a single barbell system; it’s about applying the right stimulus at the right time. Every methodology has a purpose when placed in its proper context:


  • Hypertrophy & General Physical Preparation (Early Off-Season): High-intensity, low-impact work (drawing from HIT or targeted bodybuilding principles) builds muscle mass, corrects imbalances, and shields joints after a grueling season.
  • Max Strength Development (Mid Off-Season): Heavy, multi-joint loading (utilizing max-effort and dynamic-effort conjugate strategies) builds force production and structural capacity.
  • Rate of Force Development & Power (Pre-Season): Explosive Olympic lifting variations and speed-strength work translate that raw force into athletic rate of force development right as the competitive calendar approaches.


It always baffled me why the field was so splintered when each method naturally fit into the foundational periodization models taught by the NSCA. Smart periodization isn't about forcing every athlete into a rigid, copy-paste template—it's about knowing when to pull specific tools out of the toolbox based on your setting, whether high school, collegiate, or professional.


The Lesson for Parents and Young Athletes


This principle of "seasons" extends far beyond college weight rooms—it is sorely missing in modern youth sports.


Today, kids are thrown into a perpetual loop of year-round competition. They play on three travel teams, compete 12 months a year, and rush from tournament to tournament without a break. There is no off-season. There is no time dedicated to building muscle, working on physical qualities, or simply letting the central nervous system recover.


If an athlete is constantly in "go, go, go" mode, they are never actually developing. They are just surviving on credit until their bodies break down.


Just like training methodologies and nutrition—where calorie needs, macronutrient ratios, and fuel strategies shift depending on workload—an athlete's physical schedule must go through distinct cycles. There must be a time to build, a time to push, and a time to rest.


The Bottom Line


No single method, system, or coach has a monopoly on athletic development. Stop looking for the "perfect program" and start respecting the process of seasonal development.


Whether you are a veteran coach mapping out a multi-year periodization plan, or a sports parent trying to keep a teenage athlete healthy: respect the cycle. Give every phase of training its proper time, and the results on game day will take care of themselves.