When looking for a qualified eye expert, contact Dr. Andrew Calman or Dr. Carolyn Carman. Both of these doctors are seasoned and knowledgeable in ophthalmology and forensic medical law. In this article, we'll discuss the benefits of hiring a seasoned ophthalmology witness. You can also learn more about Dr. Andrew Calman and Dr. Carolyn Carman, two other top-rated eye experts.
Dr. Andrew Calman
With over 20 years of experience as an Expert Ophthalmology Witness, Dr. Andrew Calman has testified in a wide range of civil rights and patent law cases. His experience includes eye injuries, medical malpractice, independent medical examinations, and antitrust disputes involving ophthalmic pharmaceuticals. He has testified for both sides of the courtroom, and his reports are well-researched and persuasive. Aside from being a respected expert in the field of ophthalmology, Dr. Calman accepts Medicare patients and accepts his fee through his office.
A board-certified ophthalmologist with a 3.8-star patient satisfaction rating on Vitals, Dr. Andrew Calman is a full-time comprehensive ophthalmologist who practices in San Francisco, CA. He specializes in treating various eye conditions, including astigmatism and binocular dysfunction. He earned his BS and MS degrees from Yale University in 1982, and his MD and PhD from the University of California San Francisco in 1989. Since then, Dr. Calman has been practicing medicine for 33 years. He currently practices at Xo Barrios MD and California Pacific Medical Center - Mission Bernal.
The expertise of Dr. Calman as an expert ophthalmology witness is crucial in any civil case involving the eye. His background in ophthalmology and his experience in medical malpractice cases makes him an excellent choice for your case. His detailed IME reports often lead to favorable settlements. Dr. Calman also provides opinions on ocular disease, as well as treatment options and complications.
Dry eye is one of the biggest issues in eye litigation. The term is used colloquially, and there is some disagreement as to what it means. However, Calman stated that the term "dry eye" referred to a group of conditions in which tear film quantity and quality are impaired. Dr. Calman's testimony helped the plaintiff in a complex case involving dry eye.
Dr. Carolyn Carman
As an expert witness, Dr. Carolyn Carman has over 30 years of experience in comprehensive eye care and has worked with people with visual impairments related to eye disease, trauma, and brain injury. She has testified in numerous cases and serves as a defense or plantiff counsel. Dr. Carman is a clinical professor and licensed Therapeutic Optometrist who is also a former chair of the Texas Optometric Board.
Plaintiff's challenge to Dr. Carman's testimony focuses on two events: the Plaintiff's 2006 Independent Medical Examination and the statement he made in his application to restore his medical license. Plaintiff claims that Dr. Carman ignored the evidence presented during his deposition testimony and cherry-picked facts to support her conclusions. Her conclusion is contrary to the position Provident Life took in the prior case.
The District Court carefully scrutinized Dr. Carman's opinion of the plaintiff's eye condition. Although Dr. Coalter's corrected distance visual acuity was based on his estimate, Dr. Carman's expert report provides additional information to support her contrary conclusion. Further, she cites evidence to support her opinion of the plaintiff's eye condition. Furthermore, she notes that Dr. Coalter's opinion is based on a flawed assessment of his eye condition.
Similarly, the case in Rahman involved the admissibility of an expert's testimony. The plaintiff was entitled to hear the testimony of a qualified expert in her field to determine whether an injured person suffered damage to his or her eyes. However, a defendant can object to the credibility of such testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702(d).
Comments ()