Justice and artificial intelligence

This document is a short analytical chronicle exploring a question that has become unavoidable in modern democracies:

Can justice continue to function without intelligent assistance tools?

Rather than attacking judicial institutions, this text offers a calm, fact-based reflection on the structural pressures facing contemporary justice systems: legal complexity, procedural overload, growing costs, and increasing inequalities between legal actors.

The chronicle clarifies a central point often misunderstood in public debate:

artificial intelligence is not a judge, not a decision-maker, and not a replacement for human justice.

It is a tool — one that can assist in organizing facts, structuring case files, detecting inconsistencies, and improving the quality of judicial decision-making without undermining judicial sovereignty.

Written in a clear and accessible style, this text is intended for:

• citizens interested in justice and democracy,
• legal professionals open to systemic reflection,
• researchers, students, and observers of institutional change,
• and anyone concerned about equality before the law in an increasingly complex world.

This publication is part of an independent series of Dissident Chronicles, aimed at opening informed public debate rather than promoting ideological positions or ready-made solutions.

No petition is attached to this document.

Its purpose is not to mobilize, but to inform, question, and encourage reflection.