
The Bradys Afloat Omnibus
Ten novella-sized nickel weeklies from the “Secret Service” series featuring “Old and Young King Brady, Detectives” dealing with cases that involve bodies of water, gathered here in one collection—the perfect vacation-week’s worth of light reading. The two New York detectives confront swamps, rivers, oceans, islands, crimes at sea, etc. Any fan of the Bradys’ exploits will naturally enjoy seeing how the two city slickers from the Big Apple manage to operate outside their natural element.
The nickel weeklies included, with their sequence numbers and original publication dates:
The Bradys Beyond Their Depth; or, The Great Swamp Mystery—No. 95, November 16, 1900
The Bradys At The Helm; or, The Mystery of the River Steamer—No. 97, November 30, 1900
The Bradys in the Everglades; or, The Strange Case of a Summer Tourist—No. 112, March 15, 1901
The Bradys at Coney Island; or, Trapping the Sea-side Crooks—No. 133, August 9, 1901
The Bradys and the Boatmen; or, The Clew Found in the River—No. 164, March 14, 1902
The Bradys at Baffin’s Bay; or, The Trail Which Led to the Arctic—No. 216, March 13, 1903
The Bradys and the Swamp Rats; or, After the Georgia Moonshiners—No. 330, May 19, 1905
The Bradys and Captain Darke; or, The Mystery of the China Liner—No. 418, January 25, 1907
The Bradys in Death Swamp; or, Downing a Desperate Band—No. 681, February 9, 1912
The Bradys and the Floating Head; or, The Clue Found in the River—No. 1183, September 23, 1921
Preparing old books (or, as in this case, weekly magazines) for digital publication is a labor of love at Travelyn Publishing. We hold our digital versions of public domain books up against any others with no fear of the comparison. Our conversion work is meticulous, utilizing a process designed to eliminate errors, maximize reader enjoyment, and recreate as much as possible the atmosphere of the original book even as we are adding the navigation and formatting necessary for a good digital book. While remaining faithful to a writer’s original words, and the spellings and usages of his era, we are not above correcting obvious mistakes. If the printer became distracted after placing an ‘a’ at the end of a line and then placed another ‘a’ at the beginning of the next line (they used to do this stuff by hand you know!), what sort of mindless robots would allow that careless error to be preserved for all eternity in the digital version, too? Not us. That’s why we have the audacity to claim that our re-publications are often better than the originals.