Language School Follow-Up Gate

A follow-up that casually assigns a level, quotes tuition, or names a class time the school never confirmed can commit the school to something it cannot deliver. This prompt drafts a factual placement-test or trial-lesson follow-up from the learner and course facts your school has actually confirmed. Its distinctive approach is a follow-up gate, not an admissions pitch: no level claims, placement decisions, tuition, enrollment availability, teacher assignments, or class times appear unless expressly confirmed, attending a trial never becomes enrollment, and a pending placement gets a factual update only when the confirmed next step states exactly what the school will do — without promising when. No sales, earnings, compliance, or outcome result is promised. What's included: one follow-up message when the facts support one (trial or placement), an internal source check, and HOLD questions when the next step is unconfirmed or the facts conflict, including the source prompt text, clearly labeled sample outputs, and a human-review step. This is a text-based digital product; no AI subscription, external account, or files are supplied with it — you use an AI chat tool of your choice. How it works: Copy the prompt text from product.md into a chat assistant, then replace the full-width bracket fields with your own notes: ［FOLLOWUP_TYPE］ (trial or placement), ［LEARNER_FACTS］, ［COURSE_FACTS］, ［CONFIRMED_NEXT_STEP］, and ［TONE］. The instructions return STATUS: READY with a follow-up message under the MESSAGE: heading and an internal SOURCE CHECK:, or STATUS: HOLD with QUESTIONS: instead of a message. The status rules and those exact terms are defined in product.md. Missing essential facts and conflicting sources lead to HOLD, not invented information. The buyer must review and approve outputs. Made for language school enrollment coordinators following up after trials and placement tests who already have the underlying facts and want an auditable first draft, not research or automated sending, and designed to be usable from copied inputs without specialist prompt-writing knowledge. FAQ: Does it fill in missing details? No — its instructions prohibit inventing details and require flags for uncertainty; AI output can still be wrong, so you must review it. Do I need a paid add-on, API, or connected account? No — you need access to a compatible AI chat; access limits and any chat-service charges depend on that provider. Is the draft ready to send or publish without review? No — the status and source checks are intended to support human verification first. Will it confirm regulations, market rules, or platform policies? No — it only uses your supplied facts and will flag external verification needs where applicable. Digital instruction text only; no professional service, legal/medical/tax advice, external research, software integration, or independent fact verification is included. The outputs depend on the facts you supply and on your AI model's adherence to instructions. You must check all drafts, applicable rules, consents, and required details before use. Fictional examples are demonstrations, not claims about real customers or performance. No sales, earnings, compliance, or outcome guarantee.