Tutor Session Recap with Evidence Lines

A parent recap can easily turn one session note into an unsupported progress claim. This prompt drafts a calm parent update from your actual session notes while labeling the observation behind each progress sentence and separating assigned work from suggestions. Its distinctive approach is an evidence line for every claim, not a generic recap writer: if the notes are vague or contradictory it marks the affected claim UNCERTAIN, and when the notes omit the specific activity it returns HOLD with questions rather than inventing a recap — then an explicit no-prediction review checks the finished email for any prediction or assertion of improvement, mastery, scores, or diagnosis the notes do not support. No sales, earnings, compliance, or outcome result is promised. What's included: a parent-facing recap when specific observations exist; a fact-to-note map; a missing-info checklist; and an explicit no-prediction review, including the source prompt text, clearly labeled sample outputs, and a human-review step. This is a text-based digital product; no AI subscription, external account, or files are supplied with it — you use an AI chat tool of your choice. How it works: (1) Copy the complete prompt into an AI chat. (2) Replace the bracketed input fields with your own facts; use "unknown" when unsure. (3) Review the evidence and HOLD/READY status; correct issues before using any draft. Made for independent tutors reporting to parents who already have the underlying facts and want an auditable first draft, not research or automated sending, and designed to be usable from copied inputs without specialist prompt-writing knowledge. FAQ: Does it fill in missing details? No — its instructions prohibit inventing details and require flags for uncertainty; AI output can still be wrong, so you must review it. Do I need a paid add-on, API, or connected account? No — you need access to a compatible AI chat; access limits and any chat-service charges depend on that provider. Is the draft ready to send or publish without review? No — the status and source checks are intended to support human verification first. Will it confirm regulations, market rules, or platform policies? No — it only uses your supplied facts and will flag external verification needs where applicable. Digital instruction text only; no professional service, legal/medical/tax advice, external research, software integration, or independent fact verification is included. The outputs depend on the facts you supply and on your AI model's adherence to instructions. You must check all drafts, applicable rules, consents, and required details before use. Fictional examples are demonstrations, not claims about real customers or performance. No sales, earnings, compliance, or outcome guarantee.