National Independent Living Program (ILP) Startup System

Files are provided individually to maintain document hierarchy, clarity, and ease of independent use.

Preview:

This product delivers document-based infrastructure for Independent Living Programs.

No coaching, consulting, licensing approval, or ongoing support is provided.

This is not coaching. This is infrastructure.

Infrastructure • Not Coaching • Not Consulting

The National Independent Living Program (NILP) Startup System is a comprehensive, document-based operational framework designed for operators building or formalizing an Independent Living Program using a license-to-occupy, non-tenancy model.

This product provides standardized core agreements, participant rights documentation, internal governance architecture, and risk-awareness materials that support program structure, boundary discipline, and national adaptability.

It does not provide approval, licensing instructions, legal advice, or regulatory endorsement.

What’s Included

• Master License Agreement (MLA)
• 56 State & Territory Program Addenda
• Member Bill of Dignity
• Intake and screening forms
• Participant agreements and acknowledgments
• Internal governance and boundary-discipline documents
• Compliance awareness and risk-literacy materials

This system is operator-facing, with participant-facing documents clearly labeled.

Internal materials are marked INTERNAL USE ONLY.

Use & Scope

You are purchasing reusable infrastructure, not services.

This system:

• Does not include coaching, consulting, or supervision
• Does not provide customization or ongoing support
• Is designed for reuse across locations and over time

Important Terms

• This product is educational and structural in nature
• No guarantees of legality, compliance, licensing, or approval are made
• Operators are solely responsible for implementation and jurisdiction-specific requirements
• ALL SALES ARE FINAL

Why This Exists

• Designed to reduce misclassification risk, not sell hope
• Built to enforce clear housing vs. program boundaries
• Avoids ongoing consulting, coaching, or custom work
• Saves months of trial-and-error and potential enforcement exposure

This system exists for operators who understand that structure is protection.

So yes — it’s worth it.

And yes — it’s defensible.