Monitorización de los mandatos de acceso abierto a través de repositorios institucionales
On Sale
€15.00
€15.00
Resumen: El apoyo de gobiernos, agencias de financiación de la investigación o instituciones académicas está afianzando el acceso abierto en comunicación científica. Cada vez se encuentran más casos en los que las recomendaciones sobre la publicación en acceso abierto se transforman en obligaciones. El Plan S, la Ley de la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación o los mandatos de universidades son algunos ejemplos de este cambio de tendencia. Ante esta situación es necesario comprobar el cumplimiento de estos mandatos al menos desde dos puntos de vista: por una parte, asegurar que las publicaciones estén en acceso abierto, y por otra que se ajusten a los plazos establecidos. Hasta ahora se han realizado intentos para la monitorización del cumplimiento de los mandatos desde diferentes perspectivas, sin embargo, pocos han tenido en cuenta el plazo en el que una publicación debe estar en acceso abierto. Para mejorar esta monitorización, se propone la utilización de la información existente en los repositorios, en concreto, la relativa a los financiadores, la fecha de publicación del trabajo en la revista académica y la fecha de depósito en el repositorio, así como la exposición de esta información a través de OAI-PMH (Open Archive Initiative – Procotol for Metadata Harvesting). De esta forma, se mejoraría la monitorización a nivel institucional. Además, esta información también podría ser recopilada por recolectores como Recolecta, de manera que puedan convertirse en un sistema de monitorización a nivel nacional de España de los mandatos sobre la publicación en acceso abierto.
Abstract: With the support of governments, research funding agencies or academic institutions, Open Access is taking hold in the field of scholarly communication. More and more cases are found where recommendations on Open Access publication are transformed into obligations that researchers must comply with. Plan S, the Spanish Law on Science, Technology and Innovation or several university mandates are some examples of this change in trend. Given this situation, it is necessary to check compliance with these mandates from at least two points of view, on the one hand, to ensure that publications are in Open Access and on the other hand, that they comply with the established deadlines. So far, several attempts have been made to monitor compliance with the mandates from different perspectives, however, few have considered the time frame in which a publication must be in Open Access. To improve this monitoring, we propose the use of existing information in the repositories, such as, information on the funders, date of publication of the work in the academic journal and date of deposit in the repository, as well as the presentation of this information through the OAI-PMH (Open Archive Initiative – Procotol for Metadata Harvesting). In this way, monitoring could be improved at the institutional level. In addition, this information could also be collected by harvesters such as Recolecta, so that they can become a tool for monitoring Open Access publication mandates at the national level.
Abstract: With the support of governments, research funding agencies or academic institutions, Open Access is taking hold in the field of scholarly communication. More and more cases are found where recommendations on Open Access publication are transformed into obligations that researchers must comply with. Plan S, the Spanish Law on Science, Technology and Innovation or several university mandates are some examples of this change in trend. Given this situation, it is necessary to check compliance with these mandates from at least two points of view, on the one hand, to ensure that publications are in Open Access and on the other hand, that they comply with the established deadlines. So far, several attempts have been made to monitor compliance with the mandates from different perspectives, however, few have considered the time frame in which a publication must be in Open Access. To improve this monitoring, we propose the use of existing information in the repositories, such as, information on the funders, date of publication of the work in the academic journal and date of deposit in the repository, as well as the presentation of this information through the OAI-PMH (Open Archive Initiative – Procotol for Metadata Harvesting). In this way, monitoring could be improved at the institutional level. In addition, this information could also be collected by harvesters such as Recolecta, so that they can become a tool for monitoring Open Access publication mandates at the national level.