Tenant Routine Message Draft with Jurisdiction Gate

A simple maintenance or access message can be mistaken for a legally valid notice — with deadlines and entry rights it never actually grants. This agent skill drafts ordinary rent-status, maintenance coordination, or inspection-request messages without asserting local notice rights, deadlines, penalties, or permission to enter. Its distinctive approach is a jurisdiction gate, not a notice generator: it classifies the issue, builds a fact ledger from your inputs, and either drafts a routine message marked READY TO REVIEW ROUTINE DRAFT or returns HOLD—LOCAL REVIEW with a local-rules question list — including an automatic HOLD when the purpose of a maintenance visit, or whether the tenant requested it, is unknown. No sales, earnings, compliance, or outcome result is promised. What's included: issue classification, fact ledger, routine message or HOLD, local-rules question list, and human/legal review gate, including the source skill text, clearly labeled sample outputs, and a human-review step. This is a text-based digital product; no AI subscription, external account, or files are supplied with it — you use an AI chat tool of your choice. How it works: (1) Paste the skill text into an AI chat (or install the file if your assistant supports skills). (2) Replace the bracketed input fields with your own facts; use "unknown" when unsure. (3) Review the evidence and the status — READY TO REVIEW ROUTINE DRAFT or HOLD—LOCAL REVIEW; correct issues before using any draft. Made for small landlords preparing routine tenant communications who already have the underlying facts and want an auditable first draft, not research or automated sending, and designed to be usable from copied inputs without specialist prompt-writing knowledge. FAQ: Does it fill in missing details? No — its instructions prohibit inventing details and require flags for uncertainty; AI output can still be wrong, so you must review it. Do I need a paid add-on, API, or connected account? No — you need access to a compatible AI chat; access limits and any chat-service charges depend on that provider. Is the draft ready to send or publish without review? No — the status and source checks are intended to support human verification first. Will it confirm regulations, market rules, or platform policies? No — it only uses your supplied facts and will flag external verification needs where applicable. Digital instruction text only; no professional service, legal/medical/tax advice, external research, software integration, or independent fact verification is included. The outputs depend on the facts you supply and on your AI model's adherence to instructions. You must check all drafts, applicable rules, consents, and required details before use. Fictional examples are demonstrations, not claims about real customers or performance. No sales, earnings, compliance, or outcome guarantee.