Description:

This Master Prompt would focus on transforming the completed narrative review into an integrated critical account of what is known, what remains uncertain, where evidence conflicts, what the literature cannot yet establish, and what research should follow. It would guide researchers in integrating major themes, conceptual relationships, methodological limitations, contextual differences, competing interpretations, practical implications, and unresolved questions into a coherent final synthesis.

A major emphasis would be placed on distinguishing genuine knowledge gaps from apparent gaps caused by weak searching, limited evidence availability, methodological heterogeneity, poor reporting, insufficient validation, or narrow geographical and population coverage. Future research recommendations would be connected directly to identifiable deficiencies rather than expressed as generic calls for “more research.”