Grantshield Pre-Mortem™
Know why your proposal will be rejected - before the evaluator does.
Know how structurally robust your proposal really is, using real scoring criteria and 150,000+ transition data points.
Know why your proposal will be rejected - before the evaluator does.
Know how structurally robust your proposal really is, using real scoring criteria and 150,000+ transition data points.
Most proposals are not weak.
They are structurally under-optimized.
Funding decisions are based on scoring logic.
Scoring logic rewards:
• Structural coherence
• Transition alignment
• Institutional positioning
• Impact plausibility
Evaluators do not rewrite proposals.
They score architecture.
GrantShield Pre-Mortem™ strengthens that architecture before submission.
This is not a standard proposal review.
• Not opinion-based feedback
• Not generic consulting
• Not editing
• Not ghostwriting
This is structured architectural stress-testing.
Powered by:
• 150,000+ country-year transition observations (AWTY dataset)
• Real scoring criteria simulation (Excellence / Impact / Implementation)
• Cross-sectional coherence analysis
• Priority correction ranking
• Independent judgment pressure simulation
You receive structural clarity.
Not commentary.
Within 48-72 hours:
• Structured scoring simulation (Excellence / Impact / Implementation)
• Structural coherence assessment
• Transition alignment analysis
• Risk concentration mapping
• Ranked structural reinforcement priorities
• 40-minute strategic debrief session
Clear. Tactical. Structurally grounded.
€2,500
Launch edition pricing.
Capacity is intentionally limited
to preserve depth and analytical independence.
All materials handled under strict professional confidentiality.
No reuse.
No redistribution.
No participation in competing consortia during evaluation window.
Full independence maintained.
Former evaluators provide experience-based feedback.
GrantShield Pre-Mortem™ applies structured scoring simulation logic
combined with AWTY transition trajectory analysis.
It strengthens structural coherence using measurable transition exposure.
No.
You receive a structured architectural assessment
and a ranked reinforcement roadmap.
Lots of rewriting suggestions.
Your team remains fully in control of writing.
Yes.
I use specific call's text, specific award criteria,
specific evaluator guidelines and the model was trained in past proposals and evaluation.
It adapts to call-specific criteria.
Then the Pre-Mortem becomes structural optimization.
Even strong proposals benefit from
coherence reinforcement and exposure mapping.
Yes.
Strict professional confidentiality.