Nonprofit Grant Answers from a Funder Question Sheet

Generic grant generators invent beneficiary counts, budgets, outcomes, and evidence — exactly the claims a funder will check. This agent skill maps the funder's actual questions to your nonprofit's own facts and creates first-pass answers only where evidence exists, leaving unsupported claims clearly unresolved. Its distinctive approach is a source-locked evidence register, not a grant writer: every answer traces to a labeled source quote from your materials, any question without a supporting fact gets a TO VERIFY slot and a BLOCKED flag instead of an affirmative paragraph, estimated numbers stay visibly marked as estimates, and conflicting figures are cited both ways rather than silently resolved. No sales, earnings, compliance, or outcome result is promised. What's included: supported question-by-question answer drafts or explicit blocked slots, a fact citation ledger, missing-evidence queue, and readiness flags, including the source skill text, clearly labeled sample outputs, and a human-review step. This is a text-based digital product; no AI subscription, external account, or files are supplied with it — you use an AI chat tool of your choice. How it works: (1) Paste the skill text into an AI chat (or install the file if your assistant supports skills). (2) Replace the bracketed input fields with your own facts; use "unknown" when unsure. (3) Review the evidence and status; correct issues before using any draft. Made for small nonprofit coordinators answering funder application forms who already have the underlying facts and want an auditable first draft, not research or automated sending, and designed to be usable from copied inputs without specialist prompt-writing knowledge. FAQ: Does it fill in missing details? No — its instructions prohibit inventing details and require flags for uncertainty; AI output can still be wrong, so you must review it. Do I need a paid add-on, API, or connected account? No — you need access to a compatible AI chat; access limits and any chat-service charges depend on that provider. Is the draft ready to send or publish without review? No — the status and source checks are intended to support human verification first. Will it confirm regulations, market rules, or platform policies? No — it only uses your supplied facts and will flag external verification needs where applicable. Digital instruction text only; no professional service, legal/medical/tax advice, external research, software integration, or independent fact verification is included. The outputs depend on the facts you supply and on your AI model's adherence to instructions. You must check all drafts, applicable rules, consents, and required details before use. Fictional examples are demonstrations, not claims about real customers or performance. No sales, earnings, compliance, or outcome guarantee.