Canada’s Hub for Economic Reconciliation™
View all results
0
View all results
0
Get Started
Canada’s Hub for Economic Reconciliation™
View all results
0
View all results
0
Get Started
Get Started
Your Cart
Loading

Economic Reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples in Canada.


Comprehensive Report (2025)


Executive summary

  • Economic reconciliation means closing persistent socio‑economic gaps while restoring Indigenous jurisdiction over lands, resources, and decision-making in ways consistent with rights, Treaties, and Indigenous worldviews. It is not charity or corporate social responsibility; it is a rights-based transformation of relationships, governance, and participation in the economy.
  • Canada has a robust legal and policy foundation: section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982; the duty to consult and accommodate; modern Treaties and self-government; the federal UNDRIP Act (2021) and BC’s DRIPA (2019); and a growing architecture of Indigenous-led financial and governance institutions. But implementation is uneven and gaps remain acute.
  • Key barriers include: limited land and resource control, infrastructure deficits, capital constraints, regulatory complexity, uneven data and participation in decisions, and ongoing socio‑economic disparities.
  • What works: equity partnerships in major projects, revenue-sharing and shared decision-making, Indigenous procurement, Indigenous-led finance, modern Treaty and self-government implementation, clean energy and infrastructure co-ownership, culturally grounded skills programs, and data sovereignty.
  • Priority moves for 2025–2030: scale Indigenous equity ownership (federal/provincial loan guarantees), entrench shared decision-making in resource and land-use regimes, hit and exceed public-sector 5% procurement targets, close the digital and housing gaps with Indigenous-led delivery, align corporate practice with FPIC and PAR standards, and standardize benefit agreements with transparency and long‑term wealth-building features.
  • Payoff: credible analyses estimate Canada’s Indigenous economy is approaching or surpassing $100 billion annually, with parity gains adding tens of billions to GDP, resilience to regions, and measurable improvements in community well‑being.
  1. Concepts and principles
  • Rights-based foundation: Economic reconciliation flows from inherent Indigenous rights, Treaties, and international standards. It means enabling Indigenous Peoples to design, own, control, and benefit from economic activity on their lands and in their communities.
  • Distinctions-based: First Nations, Inuit, and Métis have distinct rights, governance structures, geographies, and economic contexts. Policy and partnerships must reflect this.
  • FPIC and shared decision-making: Free, Prior and Informed Consent (UNDRIP) requires early, transparent, and resourced processes that can achieve consent; where consent is not achieved, parties work to avoid or mitigate rights impacts and seek pathways forward consistent with law and agreements.
  • Nation- and community-led development: Economic strategies are most effective when they are designed by Indigenous governments and organizations, built on culture and language, and supported by stable fiscal arrangements.
  • Data sovereignty and OCAP: Indigenous control of data (Ownership, Control, Access, Possession) is essential for planning, accountability, and measurement.
  1. Legal and policy framework (snapshot)
  • Constitution and jurisprudence
  • Section 35 recognizes and affirms Aboriginal and Treaty rights.
  • Landmark cases: Calder (1973), Sparrow (1990), Delgamuukw (1997), Haida/Taku (2004) on duty to consult, Mikisew (2005), Tsilhqot’in (2014) establishing Aboriginal title, Clyde River/Chippewas of the Thames (2017) on regulatory consultation duties, and Reference re Impact Assessment Act (2023) clarifying federal-provincial roles without diminishing section 35 duties.
  • UNDRIP and action plans
  • Federal UNDRIP Act (2021) commits Canada to align laws with UNDRIP; Action Plan published in 2023 outlines measures on FPIC, lands, justice, and economic participation.
  • BC’s DRIPA (2019) requires alignment of provincial laws and provides for agreements on shared decision-making; multiple sectoral agreements are being implemented.
  • Treaties and self-government
  • Historic Treaties and modern Treaties/Comprehensive Land Claims cover large areas, with fiscal transfers, resource rights, and co-management structures. Self-government agreements enhance jurisdiction in economic, land, and social policy.
  • Fiscal and land management instruments
  • First Nations Fiscal Management Act: institutions include the First Nations Finance Authority (FNFA), Financial Management Board (FMB), and Tax Commission (FNTC); recent reforms add the First Nations Infrastructure Institute (FNII).
  • Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management enables First Nations to exit sections of the Indian Act to enact their own land codes, speeding economic development.
  • Consultation and environmental assessment
  • Duty to consult and accommodate triggers in federal/provincial regulatory processes; many boards now integrate Indigenous knowledge and rights considerations. Evolving federal amendments post-2023 IAA reference aim to respect jurisdiction while maintaining rights protections.
  • Procurement and participation
  • Federal commitment to award a minimum 5% of contracts to Indigenous businesses, complemented by provincial and municipal initiatives.
  • Equity participation frameworks
  • Growing suite of Indigenous loan guarantee programs (federal, Alberta, Ontario, Saskatchewan; emerging in BC) to support Indigenous equity in energy and infrastructure.
  1. Current state of the Indigenous economy (high-level)
  • Scale and trajectory
  • Indigenous entrepreneurship is growing quickly; Indigenous businesses operate across all sectors with strong representation in construction, natural resources, professional services, tourism, and clean energy.
  • Analyses by Indigenous and mainstream institutions estimate the Indigenous economy is approaching or exceeding $100 billion annually, with significant upside if policy and partnership barriers are removed.
  • Employment and income
  • Employment and income gaps persist relative to non‑Indigenous populations, with variation by region and distinctions. Urban Indigenous populations face different barriers than those on reserve or in northern communities.
  • Community infrastructure
  • Housing, water/wastewater, roads, broadband, and community facilities deficits remain significant—especially in remote and northern areas—and directly constrain economic activity.
  • Land and resource access
  • In many regions, cumulative impacts have degraded Treaty rights and traditional economies; notable settlements (e.g., Blueberry River–BC) are reshaping land-use planning and restoration financing.
  1. Barriers to economic reconciliation
  • Jurisdictional and regulatory
  • Misalignment between federal/provincial regimes and Indigenous jurisdictions; slow or unpredictable regulatory timelines; insufficient resourcing of Indigenous participation in assessments and land-use planning.
  • Capital and finance
  • Limited collateral under the Indian Act, higher cost of capital, and deal-by-deal financing for equity stakes; undercapitalization of Aboriginal Financial Institutions (AFIs) relative to demand.
  • Infrastructure and digital divide
  • High cost to build and maintain in remote/northern regions; lag in broadband and reliable energy undermines entrepreneurship, education, and health.
  • Data and transparency
  • Confidential Impact Benefit Agreements (IBAs) limit benchmarking; inconsistent data collection impedes policy design and accountability.
  • Capacity and skills
  • Gaps in access to culturally safe education, trades training, and management pathways; insufficient funding stability for Indigenous Skills and Employment Training (ISET) organizations.
  • Social determinants
  • Housing scarcity, cost of living, food insecurity in the North, and health inequities reduce labour force participation and entrepreneurship.
  • Procurement and supply chain access
  • Fragmented vendor registration and limited supplier development support impede scaling of Indigenous businesses.
  1. What works: proven mechanisms and models
  • Shared decision-making and consent-based agreements
  • Indigenous-government agreements that embed FPIC principles, co-develop land-use plans, and establish dispute resolution reduce project risk and improve outcomes.
  • Equity ownership in major projects
  • Indigenous equity stakes in pipelines, transmission lines, renewable generation, and other infrastructure create long-term revenue and governance seats, aligning interests and enabling intergenerational wealth. Loan guarantees at federal and provincial levels are unlocking these deals.
  • Impact Benefit Agreements 2.0
  • Evolving IBAs incorporate training-to-employment pipelines, revenue-sharing tied to production/performance, equity options, procurement set-asides, environmental guardianship funding, and transparency mechanisms.
  • Revenue-sharing and tax arrangements
  • Provincial revenue-sharing for forestry/mining, First Nations Goods and Services Tax (FNGST), and own-source revenue agreements provide predictable funding.
  • Indigenous-led finance and fiscal institutions
  • FNFA’s pooled borrowing, FMB certification, FNTC property tax regimes, and AFIs (via NACCA) have delivered billions in capital with strong repayment performance; scaling these is key.
  • Indigenous procurement
  • Targets with transparent reporting, supplier development, and certification (e.g., CCAB’s Supply Change, CAMSC, PAR) expand markets and build capacity.
  • Clean energy and community infrastructure
  • Indigenous-led or co-owned renewables, microgrids in diesel-reliant communities, energy efficiency retrofits, and housing construction stimulate local jobs and reduce costs while aligning with stewardship.
  • Guardians and land stewardship economies
  • Indigenous Guardians programs create skilled employment, strengthen land management, and can integrate with restoration finance and nature-based carbon projects when designed with community benefit and rigorous MRV.
  • Education and skills pathways
  • Holistic programs that connect K–12 success, post-secondary support (e.g., Indspire), trades/apprenticeship programs, and on-the-job mentorship produce durable outcomes.
  1. Sectoral opportunities (illustrative)
  • Energy and transmission
  • Co-ownership of generation and transmission, grid modernization, storage, and community energy planning; formalized equity offerings in new lines are emerging as policy in multiple provinces.
  • Critical minerals and mining
  • From exploration to closure, Indigenous equity, IBAs, and revenue-sharing, paired with environmental co-governance, can accelerate responsible projects.
  • Housing and community infrastructure
  • Large-scale, Indigenous-led housing programs unlock trades careers, local enterprises, and better health/education outcomes; FNII can standardize project delivery.
  • Broadband and digital
  • Indigenous-owned ISPs and last-mile networks; digital skills training and tech entrepreneurship.
  • Tourism and culture
  • Authentic Indigenous-led tourism, conservation economies, and cultural industries with IP protections.
  • Nature-based solutions
  • Restoration, carbon projects, and biodiversity credits where governance, FPIC, and benefit-sharing are robust.
  • Public administration and services
  • Growing Indigenous public sectors under self-government and modern Treaties require procurement, professional services, and technology.
  1. Roles and responsibilities
  • Indigenous governments and organizations
  • Lead vision and decision-making; develop economic strategies; establish development corporations; negotiate and manage partnerships; exercise data sovereignty; build institutions.
  • Federal government
  • Align laws with UNDRIP; resource FPIC processes; fund and guarantee Indigenous equity; meet procurement targets; close infrastructure gaps; support AFIs and ISET; accelerate additions-to-reserve and specific claims.
  • Provincial/territorial governments
  • Implement DRIPA-like alignment where applicable; establish equity/loan guarantees; share resource revenues; co-develop land-use plans; reform permitting to include shared decisions and capacity funding.
  • Municipalities and regional districts
  • Conclude servicing agreements, joint planning, and Indigenous procurement; support urban Indigenous hubs and entrepreneurship.
  • Industry and investors
  • Treat Indigenous partners as co-owners where appropriate; adopt internal FPIC policies; budget for capacity, monitoring, and long-term benefits; seek PAR certification; tie executive incentives to reconciliation metrics; respect Indigenous IP and knowledge.
  • Financial sector and philanthropy
  • Provide patient capital; standardize Indigenous equity finance; backstop via guarantees; fund early-stage feasibility and capacity; support Indigenous financial intermediaries.
  1. Implementation roadmap (2025–2030)
  • 0–12 months
  • Operationalize the federal Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program with clear, distinctions-based criteria; coordinate with provincial programs to reduce overlap.
  • Publish federal and provincial guidance on FPIC-aligned consultations that include capacity funding and clear timelines.
  • Hit federal 5% Indigenous procurement target across all departments; publish department-by-department dashboards.
  • Capitalize AFIs/NACCA to meet demand; expand micro-loan and growth capital products.
  • Launch an Indigenous Infrastructure Accelerator with FNII/FNFA for housing, water, broadband, and energy microgrids.
  • 12–36 months
  • Embed shared decision-making agreements in priority resource regions; co-develop cumulative effects frameworks and restoration funds.
  • Standardize “IBA plus equity” templates with transparency features and dispute resolution; build an optional repository of anonymized benchmarks.
  • Scale Indigenous training-to-employment pipelines tied to specific projects and public builds; align with apprenticeship reforms.
  • Expand Guardians programs and link to restoration and nature finance with robust MRV and community benefit trusts.
  • Establish urban Indigenous economic hubs connecting procurement, entrepreneurship, childcare, and training.
  • 36–60 months
  • Conclude additional self-government and modern Treaties; stabilize fiscal transfers and own-source revenue arrangements.
  • Achieve near-universal 50/10 broadband in Indigenous communities with Indigenous ownership structures where feasible.
  • Normalize Indigenous equity participation in major energy, transmission, and critical mineral projects; integrate Indigenous seats in governance.
  • Close core housing gaps in priority regions via Indigenous-led delivery and local workforce development.
  • Publish an annual Indigenous Economic Reconciliation scorecard co-governed with Indigenous institutions.
  1. Corporate best practices checklist
  • Governance: Board-level oversight of reconciliation; Indigenous representation; FPIC policy; PAR certification roadmap.
  • Strategy: Co-create long-term partnerships; target Indigenous equity opportunities; allocate multi-year capacity budgets.
  • Operations: Indigenous procurement targets; inclusive HR and apprenticeship pathways; cultural safety training; Indigenous data protocols.
  • Finance and risk: Model partnership and consent pathways as de-risking; pursue blended finance with guarantees; align executive compensation with reconciliation metrics.
  • Transparency: Report on IBAs’ core elements (where permitted), procurement, employment, and environmental outcomes; support community monitoring.
  1. Measurement and accountability
  • Core indicators (co-developed)
  • Income, employment, and business growth; procurement volumes and supplier development; equity stakes and returns; infrastructure access (housing, water, broadband, energy); education and credential attainment; environmental indicators (restoration, emissions reductions, harvested foods access); governance milestones (Treaties, self-government, land-use co-plans).
  • Data governance
  • Respect OCAP and similar Inuit/Métis data principles; use Indigenous data platforms; ensure benefits flow back to communities.
  • Reporting cadence
  • Annual public scorecards; independent audits via Indigenous institutions (FMB/FNFA/CCAB); integrate into ESG disclosures.
  1. Risks and how to avoid them
  • Rights-washing: Using “reconciliation” as PR without material shifts in power or benefits. Remedy: equity, shared decision-making, measurable outcomes.
  • One-size-fits-all: Ignoring distinctions and local contexts. Remedy: co-design and flexible tools.
  • Short-termism: Focusing on construction-phase jobs only. Remedy: revenue/equity and long-term training.
  • Confidentiality overreach: Excessive secrecy in agreements undermines accountability. Remedy: standardized transparency clauses.
  • Capacity drain: Over-consultation without funding. Remedy: resource participation and build permanent institutions.
  1. Selected case examples (brief)
  • Equity in pipelines and energy infrastructure
  • Multi-First Nation equity consortia have acquired significant stakes in operating pipelines and are negotiating stakes in transmission projects, supported by provincial loan guarantees and pooled Indigenous finance. These models demonstrate reduced project risk, reliable returns, and improved community outcomes.
  • Blueberry River–BC land use reset
  • After a court finding of Treaty infringement due to cumulative impacts, the subsequent agreements include funding for restoration, revised land-use planning, and new rules for development—illustrating how rights recognition can catalyze sustainable economic planning.
  • Indigenous clean energy and microgrids
  • Dozens of Indigenous communities co-own wind, solar, hydro, and storage assets, replacing diesel, cutting costs, and creating skilled jobs, often with Indigenous utilities or co-ops.

Recommendations summary

  • Make Indigenous equity ownership normal, not novel: fully fund loan guarantees and standardize finance.
  • Put FPIC into practice: shared decision-making, early engagement, and resourced processes.
  • Buy Indigenous at scale: exceed 5% procurement with supplier development and transparency.
  • Build the enabling platform: housing, broadband, energy, and roads through Indigenous-led infrastructure programs.
  • Strengthen Indigenous institutions: FNFA/FMB/FNTC/FNII, AFIs, education and training networks, Guardians programs, and data platforms.
  • Measure what matters: co-governed scorecards tied to funding and executive incentives.

References and further reading


Back to blog
  • Maestro
  • Mastercard
  • Visa
  • Discover
Powered by Payhip

By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies. We use cookies to provide necessary site functionality and provide you with a great experience.