Gartner Consolidated Assessment Report
The Authority Question: Does Influence Equal Outcomes?
Gartner generates $6.3 billion annually advising enterprises on technology decisions. Industry implementation failure rates have remained at 50–80% throughout 20+ years of that advisory influence. This is not an accusation — it is a measurement.
This independent assessment applies the Hansen Fit Score™ to the world's largest technology advisory firm — the same framework applied to every vendor we assess.
What's Inside:
- Hansen Fit Score™ estimates for technology capability, service delivery, and minimum client readiness required
- Evidence base from Gartner's own published research, SEC filings, and multimodel validation (5/5 models agree)
- The "Authority Paradox" — why 20+ years of Magic Quadrants, Hype Cycles, and maturity models have not moved the baseline failure rate
- The "World Authority on AI" claim assessed against four pillars: volume, breadth, predictive accuracy, and measured outcomes
- Revenue model incentive analysis — $6.3B structurally disconnected from implementation outcomes
- "Certainty Theater" — the pattern of frameworks that create the appearance of structured decision-making while leaving readiness unmeasured
- Gartner's AI Literacy Roadmap analysis — and the critical Phase 0 step it skips
- Five critical questions to ask before relying on Gartner for selection or implementation decisions
- Practitioner recommendations for CPOs and procurement leaders
Methodology:
RAM 2025™ multimodel validation using five independent AI models analyzing publicly available data. 100% vendor-neutral — no vendor interviews, no demos, no sponsorship. Based on 18 years of Procurement Insights Archives (2007–2026).
Who This Is For:
- Procurement leaders evaluating technology with Gartner guidance
- Organizations currently subscribing to Gartner for selection decisions
- CPOs who want to know what a $15,000 Gartner subscription measures — and what it doesn't
- Anyone who wants the assessment Gartner will never publish about itself
The ROI:
If a failed implementation costs $3M and the failure rate is 65%, your risk exposure is $1.95M. This report costs 0.09% of that risk.
Hansen Models — Practitioner Performance Analysis & Vendor Reconciliation Exposed. Explainable. Repeatable.