TSELA The Womb-Man

We defined woman by what she does for man, not by what she is in herself. This is the oldest fallacy: to reduce being to utility. Aristotle would call it confusing final cause with formal cause. We said her purpose is to be a home-maker, a child-bearer, a help, and then concluded that this is all she is.

But multiplication is not a domestic skill. It is an ontological power. To take what is formless and give it form, to take what is raw and give it meaning, to take what is potential and bring it to act — this is the very definition of creation. The woman does not merely help creation. In her own mode, she _is_ creation continuing.