Most "methodology problems" are not methodology problems. They are a supervisor who keeps changing their mind, a committee that wants two different things, or a decision nobody has actually defended out loud yet. You receive:
1. Strategic Verdict: A clear assessment of how defensible your current methodology or manuscript strategy is and where the main risk sits.
2. Defensibility Diagnosis: A review of the alignment between your research question, design, sample, data, analysis, claims, contribution, and publication or submission goal.
3. Likely Objections: The strongest questions a supervisor, examiner, reviewer, editor, or committee member is likely to raise.
4. Revision Priorities: A practical order of what to fix first, what can wait, and what should not be “polished” before the logic is corrected.
5. Methodological Reference Guidance: Key methodological sources that can strengthen your justification and help you support the decisions you need to defend.
6. Journal and Publication Direction: Where relevant, guidance on article positioning, journal fit, contribution, reviewer risk, and possible publication strategy.
The goal is not to give you more generic advice. The goal is to help you understand what kind of research problem you actually have and what decision should come next.
If your biggest risk isn't the methodology itself but the supervisor relationship around it, the Supervisor Profile add-on above goes deeper into exactly that.