We live in an era of relative stability. In many developed countries, food, water and electricity are predictable. Most people reading this have a roof that doesn’t leak, doors that lock, and a safe, warm bed not shared with strangers.
Historically speaking, this is extraordinary.
There is a particular kind of modern absurdity growing that is hard to ignore.
Over the past two centuries, global extreme poverty has declined dramatically. Life expectancy has more than doubled in many regions since 1900, and infant mortality has dropped. Access to sanitation, infrastructure, and reliable food has expanded across much of the world.
This doesn’t mean suffering has completely disappeared. It means that baseline survival threat has decreased for many.
And somehow, the volume of grievance is rising to staggering levels.
A job has become oppression, because it expects output.
A home has become exploitation, because it requires maintenance.
Children have become “emotional labour.”
Marriage has become “slavery.”
Responsibility is being reframed as injustice, and somewhere along the line, inconvenience became a human rights violation.
We Have Lost Scale
Psychological research on hedonic adaptation demonstrates that human beings rapidly normalize improvements in circumstances, so what once felt like privilege has become a baseline expectation. Satisfaction levels return to neutral, and new dissatisfaction emerges.
Now add to this the social comparison effect. Decades of research show that upward comparison, particularly when constant and unfiltered (social media influencers, anyone?), increases dissatisfaction. Social media has industrialized this process, and we constantly compare our actual lives to curated fragments of someone else’s.
Without downward calibration, the scale collapses. And when the scale collapses, minor inconvenience becomes catastrophe.
So, a demanding week at work becomes an existential threat. A messy living room feels intolerable. A partner’s bad mood is suddenly the end of the world.
Friction is not the same as suffering.
No roof over your head is instability.
No income is instability.
War is instability.
Displacement is instability.
We blur these categories at our own psychological expense. Perspective does not erase difficulty; it gives it context.
The Currency of Complaint
Modern Western culture increasingly rewards grievance. Sociologists Bradley Campbell and Jason Manning describe what they call a “victimhood culture,” in which one’s moral status is derived from publicizing offense, and appealing to third parties for validation.
In a culture like this, suffering confers status. Complaint signifies moral awareness, and responsibility is secondary to recognition.
Because if I frame my responsibilities as oppression, I gain sympathy and validation. I gain exemption from certain forms of accountability.
But when everything is oppression, nothing is responsibility, and without responsibility, there is no agency.
So, let me ask this then: if maintaining your home is exploitation, what exactly did you think adulthood would involve?
If being expected to perform at work is betrayal, what do you believe a paycheck represents?
Security is not self-sustaining. It requires effort.
Effort is not abuse.
The Reframing of “Unpaid Labour”
I want to address this directly and clearly.
Domestic work is real work. It requires time, coordination, cognitive tracking, and emotional regulation. Research on cognitive load and household management confirms that invisible planning and anticipation can be taxing. No one is disputing this.
But something has shifted in the framing.
The language of “unpaid labour” is increasingly being used not to describe economic imbalance, but to morally indict the structure of family life itself.
Caring for your own children is now framed as exploitation.
Maintaining your shared home is now a systemic injustice.
Providing emotional support to a partner is a disproportionate burden.
There is a difference between inequity and resentment.
If one partner is genuinely overburdened and the other refuses to contribute (after being directly requested, not through “mind reading”), that is a relational imbalance that must be addressed.
But if the mere presence of effort becomes proof of oppression, the problem is no longer distribution. It is meaning.
Reframing chosen responsibility as coerced labour, gratitude is destroyed. This is where men are affected most, and usually quietly.
If a man works full time, commutes, absorbs occupational stress, and carries everything financially, but the narrative is centred exclusively on the “unpaid labour” within the home, his contribution becomes invisible. If his effort is treated as baseline obligation (“bare minimum”) while domestic effort is treated as a moral sacrifice, asymmetry forms and the perspective becomes dangerously skewed.
Men don’t require worship. They require proportion. He’s not asking for a 21-gun salute, fanfare and celebrations with fireworks for loading the dishwasher. A “thanks, babe” will be more than enough.
Relational research consistently shows that perceived appreciation predicts relationship satisfaction and stability. When effort is acknowledged, bonds strengthen, and when effort is minimized, resentment grows.
The issue isn’t that domestic work exists. The issue is that contribution is narrated selectively. Recognizing male provision and emotional strain doesn’t negate the reality of women’s labour; it simply restores proportion to the conversation.
Comfort Without Perspective Breeds Fragility
If your way of life has never been threatened, your nervous system isn’t calibrated for real threat. This isn’t a character flaw. Minor inconvenience registers as major harm. Still not a character flaw, just underdeveloped tolerance.
And let me just say as well, as someone whose nervous system is fine-tuned by threat and abuse, that I do not wish that on anyone. Hardship isn’t morally superior; many people are broken by it. Chronic stress correlates with depression, anxiety, and health deterioration. Poverty is not romantic. It’s miserable.
However, exposure to suffering often produces proportion. People who have lost their homes tend to prioritize between clutter and catastrophe. People who have lost income prioritize between a demanding boss and unemployment.
Gratitude isn’t ignorance of difficulty. It’s being aware of the scale. Scale awareness makes you psychologically stronger, not weaker.
The Psychological Cost to Men
Men already occupy a precarious emotional position in modern culture.
They are less likely to seek mental health support. In most countries, they die by suicide at significantly higher rates than women. They are less likely to receive routine emotional affirmation, more likely to work in dangerous occupations and account for the vast majority of workplace fatalities globally.
Now add to this a cultural narrative in which male provision is treated as expected but unremarkable, male stress is often filtered through a privilege framework that minimizes individual burden, and male presence in family life is increasingly narrated as either secondary or burdensome, rather than foundational. When stability is portrayed as oppression, the men maintaining that stability are reframed as beneficiaries rather than contributors. That distortion has psychological consequences.
Men withdraw when their effort is chronically minimised. They disengage when contribution is primarily met with complaint. We are already observing measurable declines in male workforce participation in several Western nations and an increase in withdrawal from long-term partnership and fatherhood.
Incentives shape behaviour. So, if responsibility is punished and grievance is rewarded, incentives shift.
The Empathy People Resist
There are women who would give anything for a child, and cannot conceive.
There are men who would give anything for a wife and family, and cannot build one.
There are elderly people in care facilities who receive no visitors.
There are workers desperate for employment.
If we distribute empathy evenly, these realities would be kept in mind when narrating our own lives. What you resent may be someone else’s heart’s desire. Empathy doesn’t erase your fatigue, it contextualizes it.
But empathy threatens martyrdom.
Because if I admit that my life contains stability and choice, I have to give up some of the validation that comes from portraying it as “unbearable”.
So instead of seeing our lives in perspective, we inflate the language and call normal effort “exploitation”, expected reciprocity “emotional labour” and responsibility “oppression.”
We strip words of meaning.
You Are Allowed to Be Tired
This isn’t a demand for silence. Of course you’re allowed to be tired, to ask for help, to address imbalances. But there is a difference between requesting support and declaring your life unjust because it requires participation.
Participation isn’t persecution.
Adulthood isn’t abuse.
Family isn’t exploitation.
Security requires maintenance. Maintenance requires effort. To sustain effort without turning bitter, you need humility. Why humility? Because you need to accept that maintenance is part of life, you are not above ordinary responsibility, effort doesn’t automatically make you oppressed, and other people are also carrying weight.
If you believe you are above maintenance, you will resent the very life you built.
The Discipline of Reverence
Gratitude isn’t a personality trait. It is a discipline, a skill you build daily, by choice. It’s not a virtue bestowed upon a select few, it’s a choice that’s made because it makes your life better.
Gratitude requires that you compare downward, not only upward. That you see the temporary and frailty in what feels permanent. Accepting that effort sustains security, and that your blessings are not oppression, doesn’t reduce you.
It expands you.
It makes small things significant. It turns the mundane into evidence of life. It strengthens resilience, and increases joy and wonder. Research on gratitude interventions consistently shows improvements in well-being, relational satisfaction, and psychological stability when practicing gratitude.
You don’t need to suffer more to earn gratitude.
You just need to recalibrate, because losing everything you casually complain about is not poetic. It is brutal.
A society that treats stability as injustice will eventually lose the individuals willing to maintain that stability.
Reverence is not weakness.
It is proportion, and proportion is what keeps both families and cultures intact.
-Nova
REFERENCES
Campbell, B., & Manning, J. (2018). The Rise of Victimhood Culture: Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars. Palgrave Macmillan.
Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 118(529), F222–F243.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314.
Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377–389.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (Various years). Safety and health at work: Global estimates of occupational injuries and fatalities.
Tay, L., Tan, K., Diener, E., & Gonzalez, E. (2013). Social relations, health behaviors, and health outcomes: A survey and synthesis. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 5(1), 28–78.
World Bank. (2022). Poverty and Shared Prosperity Report.
World Health Organization. (2023). Suicide worldwide: Global health estimates.
Comments ()