I’ve been observing the Lindsay Clancy case over the past few weeks and I am…baffled. But not for the reason you may think.
We’ve got people defending Clancy despite substantial evidence, reframing her from perpetrator to victim, her husband being blamed, bizarre astrological arguments, re-enactments of murders with dolls from people going “same, Lindsay” with a terrifying emotionally intense identification.
What the hell are we actually watching?
This isn’t merely disagreement over a criminal case. There’s something a lot more psychologically interesting being demonstrated here.
I hypothesise that the women so vehemently defending Clancy all have 1 thing in common: ideology has become fused with their identity.
Comments ()